<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">467994188</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323112553.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19900601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00389674</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00389674</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Modeling the timing of business firm exits</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Peter Garrod, Walter Miklius]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The previous theoretical studies of the timing of business exits have employed two different approaches. They have either developed sequential decision-making models or models based on gambler's ruin. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate both approaches. For this task some simple models of the exit process are developed and it is shown that both types of models are capable of generating the observed patterns of firm mortality. The reasonableness of the assumptions and the importance of key variables in the two models are tested using a case study of restaurant exits. We find that the sequential decision-making model would have to be rather complex to serve as a realistic descriptive model of the exit process. Gambler's ruin models, on the other hand, provide a realistic descriptive model not only of the environment in which a large portion of this industry operates, but of the decision process as well. Models based on gambler's ruin may, therefore, provide a potentially useful approach for modeling exit process in other industries dominated by small firms.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Garrod</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Hawaii at Manoa, 96822, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Miklius</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Walter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Hawaii at Manoa, 96822, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Small Business Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">2/2(1990-06-01), 141-153</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0921-898X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">2:2&lt;141</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">2</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11187</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389674</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389674</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Garrod</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Peter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Hawaii at Manoa, 96822, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Miklius</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Walter</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">University of Hawaii at Manoa, 96822, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Small Business Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">2/2(1990-06-01), 141-153</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0921-898X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">2:2&lt;141</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1990</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">2</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11187</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
