caa a22 4500 467996822 CHVBK 20180323112559.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19901201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF02299020 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02299020 Low price conspiracy: Trade regulation and the case of Japanese electronics [Elektronische Daten] [Gary Bowman, Erwin Blackstone] Conclusion: The analysis of low price conspiracy suggests that even if it were legal, it requires very special and uncommon conditions. Such conditions were not present in the U.S. television industry, and the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the evidence did not support the existence of a low price conspiracy involving Japanese television manufacturers. The Court indicated that persuasive actual cost evidence must be presented to overcome economic logic that predation is very unlikely. Predation can still be shown but the standard of proof is high. After all allegations of low price conspiracy may be more likely to limit competition than any actual low price conspiracy itself. Atlantic Economic Society, 1990 Bowman Gary aut Blackstone Erwin Temple University, Philadelphia aut Atlantic Economic Journal Kluwer Academic Publishers 18/4(1990-12-01), 59-67 0197-4254 18:4<59 1990 18 11293 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299020 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299020 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Bowman Gary aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Blackstone Erwin Temple University, Philadelphia aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Atlantic Economic Journal Kluwer Academic Publishers 18/4(1990-12-01), 59-67 0197-4254 18:4<59 1990 18 11293 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer