<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469025840</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323132729.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920801xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00185095</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00185095</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Osemeobo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Gbadebo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Federal Department of Forestry, POB 2495, Garki-Abuja, Nigeria</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Religious practices and biotic conservation in Nigeria: conflict or compromise?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Gbadebo Osemeobo]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This study employed cross-sectional data derived in 1990-91 to consider the contributions of religious institutions practices to biotic conservation. The evidence indicates that religious practices were varied, mixed and positive towards modern trends in conservation. However, the enforcement of religious practices was voluntary and largely based on lines of weak resistance. The religious were unable to enforce their injunctions in the face of rural poverty and state laws. Based on the trend analysis, the African Traditional Religion tends to have negative impact on the diversity of biotic resources. Nevertheless, this conclusion appears weak and constrained by difficulties posed by multiple use of a biotic resource for food, souvenir, cash and traditional medicine; and great problems involved in isolating the sole factor for resource exploitation. It is on this basis that policy instruments must be employed to control and manage biotic resources to sustain their utilization within ecological limits.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">GeoJournal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/4(1992-08-01), 331-338</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0343-2521</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:4&lt;331</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10708</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185095</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185095</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Osemeobo</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Gbadebo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Federal Department of Forestry, POB 2495, Garki-Abuja, Nigeria</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">GeoJournal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/4(1992-08-01), 331-338</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0343-2521</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:4&lt;331</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10708</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
