caa a22 4500 469031484 CHVBK 20180323132744.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19920301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF01883898 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01883898 EPR [Elektronische Daten] [Alan Hájek, Jeffrey Bub] We present an exegesis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics, and defend it against the critique in Fine. (1) We contend,contra Fine, that it compares favorably with an argument reconstructed by him from a letter by Einstein to Schrödinger; and also with one given by Einstein in a letter to Popper. All three arguments turn on a dubious assumption of "separability,” which accords separate elements of reality to space-like separated systems. We discuss how this assumption figures in the literature spawned by the Bell inequalities. Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1992 Hájek Alan Department of Philosophy, Princeton University, 08542-4607, Princeton, New Jersey aut Bub Jeffrey Committee on History and Philosophy of Science, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, Maryland aut Foundations of Physics Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 22/3(1992-03-01), 313-332 0015-9018 22:3<313 1992 22 10701 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883898 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883898 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Hájek Alan Department of Philosophy, Princeton University, 08542-4607, Princeton, New Jersey aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Bub Jeffrey Committee on History and Philosophy of Science, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, Maryland aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Foundations of Physics Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 22/3(1992-03-01), 313-332 0015-9018 22:3<313 1992 22 10701 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer