caa a22 4500 469031964 CHVBK 20180323132745.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19920201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF01893611 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01893611 Woodward James Departments of History and Physics, California State University, 92634, Fullerton, California aut Logic of discovery or psychology of invention? [Elektronische Daten] [James Woodward] It is noted that Popper separates the creation of concepts, conjectures, hypotheses and theories—the context of invention—from the testing thereof—the context of justification—arguing that only the latter is susceptible of rigorous logical analysis. Efforts on the part of others to shift or eradicate the demarcation established by this distinction are discussed and the relationship of these considerations to the claims of "strong artificial intelligence” is pointed out. It is argued that the mode of education of scientists, as well as reports of celebrated scientists, support Popper's judgement in this matter. An historical episode from Faraday's later career is used to illustrate the historiographical strength of Lakatos' "methodology of research programs.” Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1992 Foundations of Physics Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 22/2(1992-02-01), 187-203 0015-9018 22:2<187 1992 22 10701 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893611 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893611 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Woodward James Departments of History and Physics, California State University, 92634, Fullerton, California aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Foundations of Physics Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 22/2(1992-02-01), 187-203 0015-9018 22:2<187 1992 22 10701 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer