<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469039892</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323132808.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19921201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00135335</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00135335</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Perry</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Roger</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Storage Technology Corporation, 2270 South 88th Street, 80028-5110, Louisville, CO, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">I DDQ testing in CMOS digital ASICs</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Roger Perry]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">I DDQ testing with precision measurement unit (PMU) was used to eliminate early life failures caused by CMOS digital ASICs in our products. Failure analysis of the rejected parts found that bridging faults caused by particles were not detected in incoming tests created by automatic test generation (ATG) for stuck-at-faults (SAF). The nominal 99.6% SAF test coverage required to release a design for production was not enough! This article shows how I DDQ testing and supplier process improvements affected our early life failure rates over a three year period. A typical I DDQ measurement distribution, effects of multiple I DDQ testing, and examples of the defects found are presented. The effects of less than 99.6% fault coverage after the I DDQ testing was implemented are reviewed. The methods used to establish I DDQ test limits and implement the I DDQ test with existing ATG testing are included. This article is a revision of one given at International Test Conference [1].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Automatic test program generation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">bridging fault</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">early life failures</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">I DDQ current</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">stuck-at fault</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Electronic Testing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">3/4(1992-12-01), 317-325</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0923-8174</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">3:4&lt;317</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">3</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10836</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135335</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135335</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Perry</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Roger</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Storage Technology Corporation, 2270 South 88th Street, 80028-5110, Louisville, CO, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Electronic Testing</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">3/4(1992-12-01), 317-325</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0923-8174</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">3:4&lt;317</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">3</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10836</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
