caa a22 4500 469041986 CHVBK 20180323132813.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19920101xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF01998075 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01998075 Schouten Henk Department of Phytopathology, Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 8025, 6700 EE, Wageningen, the Netherlands aut Effectiveness of preventing flowering of hawthorn in protecting pear orchards from fire blight infection [Elektronische Daten] [Henk Schouten] Since 1984 when a new Ministerial Regulation on fire blight came into force, there have been 20 ‘protected regions' in the Netherlands, where nurseries of rosaceous plants, and pear and apple orchards are extra protected against fire blight. This policy is also necessary to meet the requirements of the European Community (EC) on fire blight. Two of the measures in the protected regions are the prohibition of flowering of the native hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna andC. laevigata), and destruction of blighted plants. In the unprotected regions, flowering is allowed, and destruction of blighted plants is limited to a zone of 500 metres around orchards. For three years, the effectiveness of preventing flowering of hawthorn in protecting pear orchards against fire blight infection was studied in the field. Five test areas of about 3 km × 3 km were chosen with hawthorns and pear orchards. Two of these areas were in protected regions and three in unprotected regions. The more than 50 000 hawthorns in the areas were grouped into 1125 sites of hawthorn. The 126 orchards larger than 0.2 ha contained about 180 000 trees. During the three years light to moderate epidemics of fire blight were observed in the regions. Fire blight occurred in 2.3% of the non-flowering sites and 19.8% of the flowering (or fruiting) sites at least once in 1987, 1988 or 1989. The prohibition of flowering for hawthorn in protected areas was rather well implemented, so that in protected areas a smaller proportion of sites of hawthorns had fire blight (4.1%) than in unprotected areas (14%). Moreover, there were fewer sites per square kilometre in the protected areas (13) than in the unprotected areas (26). In protected areas, 53% and in unprotected areas 59% of the pear orchards had fire blight during 1987, 1988 or 1989. The difference was not significant. The first reason for the ineffectiveness of the preventing of flowering prevention in hawthorn to control fire blight in pear orchards was the inadequate hygiene of the pear orchards in both types of region. If it be assumed that a new focus is most probably initiated by the nearest existing focus, the second reason was that fire blight hardly spread from hawthorn to pear in the period of this study. Spread of fire blight within pear orchards and between pear orchards occurred frequently. Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging, 1992 Crataegus monogyna nationallicence Crataegus laevigata nationallicence Erwinia amylovora nationallicence Pyrus communis nationallicence epidemiology nationallicence bacterial disease nationallicence spread nationallicence Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Kluwer Academic Publishers 98/1(1992-01-01), 21-32 0028-2944 98:1<21 1992 98 10658 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01998075 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01998075 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Schouten Henk Department of Phytopathology, Wageningen Agricultural University, P.O. Box 8025, 6700 EE, Wageningen, the Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Kluwer Academic Publishers 98/1(1992-01-01), 21-32 0028-2944 98:1<21 1992 98 10658 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer