<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469042281</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323132814.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01974468</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01974468</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Torrance</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Virology Department, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, DD2 5DA, Dundee, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Developments in methodology of plant virus detection</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[L. Torrance]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">As a general rule some form of polyclonal-antibody based enzyme immunoassay is still preferred for routine plant virus detection, but modifications may be necessary when increased sensitivity or specificity is required. In recent years new developments in antibody-based detection methods have mostly involved the provision of specific reagents, such as monoclonal antibodies or affinity-purified second antibody-enzyme conjugates which have helped to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the assays. Other kinds of tests (such as nucleic acid hybridisation) must be used when tests for virus coat protein are not appropriate. Recently, tests based on the polymerase chain reaction show great promise. There is no single universal test: assays must be devised and optimised for each pathogen. The challenge with all types of test is to make them quicker, less labour intensive, and —if possible — cheaper.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">EIA</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">monoclonal antibody</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">potato</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">biotin</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">PCR</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">98(1992-03-01), 21-28</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0028-2944</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">98&lt;21</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">98</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10658</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974468</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974468</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Torrance</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Virology Department, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, DD2 5DA, Dundee, UK</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">98(1992-03-01), 21-28</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0028-2944</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">98&lt;21</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">98</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10658</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
