caa a22 4500 469050780 CHVBK 20180323132830.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19920701xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF00162098 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00162098 Comparison of two methods for seismic hazard assessment in a low-seismicity area [Elektronische Daten] [Th. De Crook, J. Egozcue] The EGO method, developed by Egozcue et al. and the SRAMSC method, originally developed by Cornell and later programmed by McGuire, to assess the seismic hazard, are compared for the low seismicity area ‘Belgium, The Netherlands, and NW Germany'. Using the same input data, the results of the EGO method without the majority criterion and the SRAMSC method with upper bound XII agree very well. The influence of the zoning is investigated for the EGO method. It is not necessary to define the zones for the EGO method so strictly as for the SRAMSC method, but too wide zones can give bad results. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992 Seismic hazard nationallicence comparison of methods nationallicence low seismicity area nationallicence De Crook Th Division of Seismology, KNMI, PO Box 201, 3730 AE, De Bilt, The Netherlands aut Egozcue J. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, ETSICCP, Gran Capitán s/n, 08034, Barcelona, Spain aut Natural Hazards Kluwer Academic Publishers 6/1(1992-07-01), 39-49 0921-030X 6:1<39 1992 6 11069 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162098 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162098 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- De Crook Th Division of Seismology, KNMI, PO Box 201, 3730 AE, De Bilt, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Egozcue J. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, ETSICCP, Gran Capitán s/n, 08034, Barcelona, Spain aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Natural Hazards Kluwer Academic Publishers 6/1(1992-07-01), 39-49 0921-030X 6:1<39 1992 6 11069 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer