<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469052511</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323132834.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19921201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01026017</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01026017</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Energy cycle diagnosis of two versions of a low resolution GCM</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[U. Ulbrich, M. Ponater]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Summary: The atmospheric energy cycle of stationary and transient waves as computed from ECMWF analysis data (1980-1987) is compared to results from two control integrations of the Hamburg T21-version of the ECMWF model. The first of these runs was carried out in 1986 with ECMWF &quot;cycle 17” parameterization. The more recent control-run was carried out in 1990 with the so-called ECHAM2-version of the model. Considerable changes have been introduced to the parameterization and numerical problems inherent in the model's code have been removed. Systematic errors of the globally integrated reservoirs of zonal available potential and kinetic energy are reduced by up to 50% compared to those produced by the older model. However, there is no thorough improvement with respect to reservoirs and conversions assigned to stationary and transient waves. When looking at zonal mean contributions it becomes clear that only certain features of the general circulation are closer to reality while others are left unchanged. For some parameters local departures from reality are even larger in the new version. Occasionally, partial improvements may lead to deterioration of global integral values because of cancellation of errors in the older model. Evidence is shown that many changes of local contributions to energy reservoirs and conversions are related to changes in model parameterization. Major importance is assigned to changes in the cloud and radiation scheme and to the introduction of a modified horizontal diffusion. The model's reaction on these external changes appears to be reasonable on the basis of physical arguments. It is concluded, that with careful study of its contributions the atmospheric energy cycle is a suitable diagnostic tool to understand a GCM's overall reaction on modifications of parameterized processes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ulbrich</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">U.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Straße 13, D-W-5000, Köln 41, Federal Republic of Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ponater</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Meteorologisches Institut der Universität Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">50/4(1992-12-01), 197-210</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0177-7971</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">50:4&lt;197</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">50</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">703</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026017</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026017</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ulbrich</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">U.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Straße 13, D-W-5000, Köln 41, Federal Republic of Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ponater</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Meteorologisches Institut der Universität Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">50/4(1992-12-01), 197-210</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0177-7971</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">50:4&lt;197</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">50</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">703</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
