<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469053852</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323132837.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920401xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF01732039</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF01732039</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Jean Lee</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Organisational Behaviour, Faculty of Business Administration, National University of Singapore, Singapore</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Quantitative versus qualitative research methods — Two approaches to organisation studies</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[S Jean Lee]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Recently, due to increasing interest in cross-cultural management, many organisational researchers are confronted with the issue of the adequacy of quantitative research methodology in cross-cultural research. Qualitative research has been advocated by many people in organisational research. The quantitative research method is seen as the conventional method in organisation studies and is considered to be &quot;objective”. The qualitative research method is seen as &quot;subjective” and &quot;descriptive” and its legitimacy often needs to be proven in organisation studies. This paper argues that such a dichotomy is oversimplified. Quantitative and qualitative research are two different approaches, based on different paradigms and different assumptions about ontology and epistemology: two human phenomena rather than two different sets of research techniques. What research discovers and how it is discovered depends on how the researcher engages in the phenomena studied. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches should be equally emphasised in organisational research.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Faculty of Business Administration National University of Singapore, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Asia Pacific Journal of Management</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/1(1992-04-01), 87-94</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0217-4561</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:1&lt;87</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10490</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732039</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732039</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Jean Lee</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">S.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Organisational Behaviour, Faculty of Business Administration, National University of Singapore, Singapore</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Asia Pacific Journal of Management</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/1(1992-04-01), 87-94</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0217-4561</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:1&lt;87</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10490</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
