caa a22 4500 469064919 CHVBK 20180323132905.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19920701xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF00890534 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00890534 Lajaunie Ch Centre de Géostatistique École des Mines de Paris, 35 Rue St. Honore, 77305, Fontainebleau, France aut Comment on "Indicator principal component kriging” by V. Suro-Pérez and A. G. Journel [Elektronische Daten] [Ch. Lajaunie] Conclusions: The indicators covariance is equivalent to the bivariate distribution of the class index. The factor decomposition of the indicator covariance proposed by SPJ is an isofactorial model of the corresponding bivariate distribution. However, the choices of cumulative indicators and of principal component analysis produce unacceptable inconsistencies. In LL, a correspondence analysis of the bivariate distribution was used to produce more satisfactory empirical factors. These were used in the procedure of identification of discrete isofactorial models, with improved consistency, and the benefit of change of support models. International Association for Mathematical Geology, 1992 Mathematical Geology Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 24/5(1992-07-01), 555-561 0882-8121 24:5<555 1992 24 11004 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890534 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 review-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890534 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Lajaunie Ch Centre de Géostatistique École des Mines de Paris, 35 Rue St. Honore, 77305, Fontainebleau, France aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Mathematical Geology Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 24/5(1992-07-01), 555-561 0882-8121 24:5<555 1992 24 11004 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer