<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469075902</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323132935.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19921201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00134925</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00134925</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Should earthquake mitigation measures be voluntary or required?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Howard Kunreuther, Anne Kleffner]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This paper examines whether or not one should require homeowners to adopt cost-effective loss reduction measures (LRMs) on residential structures in earthquake prone areas. Congress is considering requiring homeowners in earthquake-prone areas to purchase earthquake insurance as a condition for a federally insured mortgage but is still debating what action should be taken regarding mitigation. We show that the incentive to voluntarily adopt LRMs is reduced if homeowners are covered by full insurance rather than being uninsured. This result holds even if individuals have accurate information on the risk and maximize expected utility. The empirical evidence indicates that few homeowners adopt mitigation measures whether they are insured or uninsured. Most individuals do not behave as if they maximize expected utility and instead seem to employ simplified decision rules which suggest that mitigation measures are unnecessary or too costly in relation to the perceived benefits. These findings suggest that it may be necessary to strengthen building codes and/or require the adoption of mitigation measures on existing structures in return for reduced earthquake insurance premiums.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kunreuther</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Howard</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Decision Sciences and Insurance, Center For Risk and Decision Processes, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kleffner</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anne</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Decision Sciences and Insurance, Center For Risk and Decision Processes, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Regulatory Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">4/4(1992-12-01), 321-333</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0922-680X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">4:4&lt;321</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">4</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11149</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134925</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134925</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kunreuther</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Howard</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Decision Sciences and Insurance, Center For Risk and Decision Processes, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kleffner</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Anne</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Decision Sciences and Insurance, Center For Risk and Decision Processes, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Regulatory Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">4/4(1992-12-01), 321-333</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0922-680X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">4:4&lt;321</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">4</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11149</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
