<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469096039</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323133031.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19921201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00317462</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00317462</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Coexistence of ecologically similar colonising species III. Drosophila aldrichi and D. buzzatii: larval performance on, and adult preference for, three Opuntia cactus species</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Robert Krebs, J.S.F. Barker, Tim Armstrong]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Two Drosophila species, D. buzzatti and D. aldrichi, coexist on several species of Opuntia cacti in Australia, primarily on O. tomentosa and O. streptacantha in the northern part of the cactus distribution, and on O. stricta in the south. Thorax length of field-collected adults was less, and the variance in length greater, than that for flies reared on simulated rots in the laboratory, indicating that these species are affected by crowding in nature. A larval performance index, measured on simulated cactus rots at low, moderate and high densities in single-species cultures, and at moderate and high densities in mixed-species cultures, was used to compare the relative intensity of intra- and interspecific competition at the same total larval density per 5 g necrotic cactus. Larval performance of both fly species was greatest on O. streptacantha, intermediate on O. tomentosa, and least on O. stricta in both single-species and mixed-species cultures. On O. stricta, the performances of D. aldrichi and D. buzzatii were not different when in single-species cultures, but that of D. aldrichi decreased significantly in mixed-species cultures. On the other two cactus species, the performances of D. aldrichi and D. buzzattii were not different in mixed-species cultures. The order of preferences by adult females for the cacti differed from that for larval performance, with females of both species prefering O. stricta. Analysis of microbial numbers growing on the cacti showed little difference among cacti at the rot age used for testing adult preference, but later growth was greater on O. tomentosa and O. streptacantha, the cacti that best supported larvae. Differential larval performance on O. stricta may contribute to the rare presence of D. aldrichi in the southern part of the cactus distribution, while the superior quality of O. tomentosa and O. streptacantha (larger rot size and higher microbial concentration) may reduce competition and facilitate cocxistence of the fly species in the north.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Larval competition</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Microbial ecology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Olfactometer</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Host plant preference</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Krebs</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Robert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Animal Science, University of New England, 2351, Armidale, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Barker</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.S.F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Animal Science, University of New England, 2351, Armidale, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Armstrong</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tim</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Animal Science, University of New England, 2351, Armidale, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Oecologia</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">92/3(1992-12-01), 362-372</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0029-8549</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">92:3&lt;362</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">92</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">442</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317462</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317462</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Krebs</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Robert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Animal Science, University of New England, 2351, Armidale, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Barker</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.S.F.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Animal Science, University of New England, 2351, Armidale, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Armstrong</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Tim</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Animal Science, University of New England, 2351, Armidale, NSW, Australia</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Oecologia</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">92/3(1992-12-01), 362-372</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0029-8549</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">92:3&lt;362</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">92</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">442</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
