<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469096330</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323133032.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19921101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00317366</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00317366</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Ammonium and nitrate uptake in gap, generalist and understory species of the genus Piper</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Arthur Fredeen, Christopher Field]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Summary: We studied root net uptake of ammonium (NH 4 + ) and nitrate (NO 3 − ) in species of the genus Piper (Piperaceae) under high, intermediate and low photosynthetically active photon flux densities (PFD). Plants were grown hydroponically, and then transferred to temperature controlled (25° C) root cuvettes for nutrient uptake determinations. Uptake solutions provided NH 4 + and NO 3 − simultaneously (both) or separately (single). In the first experiment, seven species of Piper, from a broad range of rainforest light habitats ranging from gap to understory, were screened for mineral nitrogen preference (100 μM NH 4 + and/or 100 μM NO 3 − ) at intermediate PFD (100 μmol m−2 s−1). Preference for NH 4 + relative to NO 3 − , defined as the ratio of NH 4 + (both):NO 3 − (both) net uptake, was higher in understory species than in gap species. Ammonium repression of NO 3 − uptake, defined as the ratio of NO 3 − (single): NO 3 − (both) net uptake, was also higher in understory species as compared to gap species. In a second set of experiments, we examined the effect of nitrogen concentration (equimolar, 10 to 1000 μM) on NH 4 + preference and NH 4 + repression of NO 3 − net uptake at high (500 μmol m−2 s−1) and low (50 μmol m−2 s−1) PFD in a gap (P. auritum), generalist (P. hispidum) and understory species (P. aequale). All species exhibited negligible NH 4 + repression of NO 3 − net uptake at high PFD. At low PFD, NH 4 + preference and repression of NO 3 − net uptake occurred in all species (understory &gt; generalist &gt; gap), but only at intermediate nitrogen concentrations, i.e. between 10 and 200 μM. Ammonium repression of net NO 3 − uptake decreased or increased rapidly (in &lt; 48 h) after transitions from low to high or from high to low PFD respectively. No significant diurnal patterns in NO 3 − or NH 4 + net uptake were observed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ammonium uptake</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Neotropics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Nitrate reductase</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Nitrate uptake</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Piper</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Fredeen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Arthur</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Field</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christopher</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Oecologia</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">92/2(1992-11-01), 207-214</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0029-8549</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">92:2&lt;207</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">92</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">442</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317366</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317366</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Fredeen</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Arthur</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Field</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christopher</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 290 Panama Street, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Oecologia</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">92/2(1992-11-01), 207-214</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0029-8549</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">92:2&lt;207</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">92</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">442</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
