caa a22 4500 46910256X CHVBK 20180323133048.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170328e19920401xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF00668398 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00668398 Engel Jr. Mylan Department of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University, 60115, DeKalb, IL, USA aut Russellizing Russell: A reply to his "A critique of Lehrer's coherentism” [Elektronische Daten] [Mylan Engel Jr.] Conclusion: Russell's attempt to demonstrate the insufficiency and nonnecessity of Lehrer's epistemology fails on both counts. His modified Nogot example does not constitute a counterexample to Lehrer's theory, though it does establish the insufficiency of (RTK). The relevant versions of both of his counterexamples to necessity occasion radically conflicting intuitions and, as a result, are far from decisive. Moreover, if they work against Lehrer's theory, and it is by no means obvious that they do, then they also demonstrate the nonnecessity of Russell's theory. In the final analysis, we may conclude that if Russell's three counterexamples demonstrate anything, they demonstrate that Lehrer's epistemology is superior to (RTK). Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992 Philosophical Studies Kluwer Academic Publishers 66/1(1992-04-01), 98-108 0031-8116 66:1<98 1992 66 11098 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00668398 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 review-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00668398 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Engel Jr Mylan Department of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University, 60115, DeKalb, IL, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Philosophical Studies Kluwer Academic Publishers 66/1(1992-04-01), 98-108 0031-8116 66:1<98 1992 66 11098 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer