<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">46910595X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323133056.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1071/APP9920070</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1071/APP9920070</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A rapid shake-elution procedure for quantifying root lesion nematodes ( Pratylenchus thornei ) in chickpea and wheat</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[K. Moore, R. Southwell, M. Schwinghamer, R. Murison]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A shake-elution procedure was evaluated for quantifying root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus thornei) in roots of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). The procedure was a combination of previously described techniques: shaking root pieces in water, sieving the water to collect the nematodes and centrifuging the nematode sample over a sucrose cushion to remove root debris. The procedure gave very clean samples of P. thornei in which the nematodes were active and readily identifiable. A statistical (failure time) model was used to describe and compare recovery profiles (cumulative recovery over time). The shake-elution procedure recovered nematodes up to 8.3 times faster than a Baermann procedure and up to 2.4 times faster than a misting procedure. For a given experiment, recovery profiles for chickpea and wheat were very similar, even when the total number of nematodes was different by a factor of more than ten. However, recovery rates varied between batches of roots collected at different times. Rate of recovery was not significantly affected by root sample size in the range 1-9 g</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Australasian Plant Pathology Society, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Moore</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Southwell</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Schwinghamer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Murison</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Australasian Plant Pathology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">21/2(1992-06-01), 70-78</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0156-0972</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">21:2&lt;70</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">21</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">13313</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9920070</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1071/APP9920070</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Moore</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Southwell</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Schwinghamer</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Murison</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Agricultural Research Centre, New South Wales Agriculture, 2340, Tamworth, New South Wales</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Australasian Plant Pathology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">21/2(1992-06-01), 70-78</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0156-0972</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">21:2&lt;70</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">21</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">13313</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
