<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469108940</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323133104.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00420585</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00420585</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Montanaro</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Adriano</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Dipartimento di ‘Metodi e Modelli Matematici per le Scienze Applicate', via Belzoni, 7, 35131, Universitá di Padova, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Uniqueness theorems for the entropy in any differential body of complexity one</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Adriano Montanaro]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">By using in an essential way a certain condition of mutual physical equivalence between admissible response functions for the heat flux, in a previous paper uniqueness theorems were proved for the response functions of the internal energy and of the equilibrium stress, in connection with differential bodies of complexity 1. It was then pointed out that the equality expressing the vanishing of the static internal dissipation uniquely determines the rate of entropy variation in terms of the rate of the internal energy variation and of the equilibrium stress. This paper shows, in a threefold manner, that the last result also holds if one does not impose the condition of physical equivalence. The first proof uses the assumption that the response functions are Euclidean invariant. The second proof uses (i) the weaker assumption of Galilean invariance and (ii) a greater degree of smoothness of the response function for the internal energy. Both of these proofs use an axiom postulating the possibility of putting the body in contact with a vacuum. The third proof of the uniqueness property for the entropy is independent of the isolation axiom and uses the assumptions of the second proof. Whereas any of the first two proofs is a consequence of the uniqueness theorem for the internal energy-proved here by using the afore-mentioned axiom-the third proof does not depend on this theorem. Rather, disregarding the above isolation axiom, it implies that uniqueness of the entropy is compatible with non-uniqueness of both the stress and internal energy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Thermodynamics of solids</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Continuum Mechanics</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Constitutive equations</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Meccanica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/2(1992-06-01), 75-83</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0025-6455</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:2&lt;75</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420585</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420585</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Montanaro</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Adriano</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Dipartimento di ‘Metodi e Modelli Matematici per le Scienze Applicate', via Belzoni, 7, 35131, Universitá di Padova, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Meccanica</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">27/2(1992-06-01), 75-83</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0025-6455</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">27:2&lt;75</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">27</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
