<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469123451</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323133145.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00042429</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF00042429</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Evaluation of the elastic T -stress in surface-cracked plates using the line-spring method</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Y. Wang, D. Parks]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The elastic T-stress has been found to be an important parameter in characterizing the very near tip elastic-plastic stress state under 2-D plane strain conditions (Larsson and Carlsson [1]; Bilby et al. [2]; Betegón and Hancock [3]; etc.). Several computational methods have been developed to evaluate the T-stress (Larsson and Carlsson [1]; Kfouri [4]; Sham [5]). However, none of these methods can be readily adapted to calculate the elastic T-stress in a surface-cracked plate (SCP), which is essentially 3-D in nature. In this paper, the line-spring method, which has proven effective in computing the stress intensity factor of SCPs, is used to evaluate the elastic T-stress along the crack front. SCPs with same length and width, but different crack geometries, from low aspect ratio (a/c=0.24) to high aspect ratio (a/c=0.70), under both remote tension and bending, are studied using the line-spring method. Detailed, three-dimensional continuum finite element (FE) solutions of some ‘extreme' cases, in terms of both aspect ratio and crack depth, under either remote tension or bending, are compared with the line-spring solutions. The line-spring solutions are in excellent agreement with the 3-D elastic FE solutions, but use 2 to 3 orders of magnitude less computational time and considerably less preparation and post-processing efforts. A concluding example demonstrates the utility of the T-stress in more accurately describing the crack front elastic-plastic field in a SCP at load levels up to moderate scale yielding.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Edison Welding Institute, 1100 Kinnear Road, 43212, Columbus, Ohio, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Parks</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Fracture</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">56/1(1992-07-01), 25-40</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0376-9429</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">56:1&lt;25</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">56</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10704</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042429</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042429</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Edison Welding Institute, 1100 Kinnear Road, 43212, Columbus, Ohio, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Parks</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">D.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Journal of Fracture</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">56/1(1992-07-01), 25-40</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0376-9429</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">56:1&lt;25</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">56</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10704</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
