<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">469127201</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180323133153.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170328e19920301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02357235</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02357235</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Nicoletti</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Paul</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 32610, Gainesville, FL, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3">
   <subfield code="a">An evaluation of serologic tests used to diagnose brucellosis in buffaloes ( Bubalus bubalis )</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Paul Nicoletti]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Summary: Five serologic procedures were evaluated in buffaloes and results compared with cultures of 64 udder secretion specimens. The rivanol test was superior to all other methods in specificity. The card, rivanol and complement fixation tests identified all infected cows. Many sera had complement fixing antibodies while agglutinins were absent. It was concluded that these were false positive results. A new procedure, the particle concentration fluorescence immunoassay, was a ensitive screening test but lacked specificity. On a limited number of samples, the tube agglutination test lacked sensitivity and was not a very useful procedure for the diagnosis of brucellosis. All 18 isolates ofBrucella abortus were biovar 1.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 1992</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Tropical Animal Health and Production</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/1(1992-03-01), 40-44</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0049-4747</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:1&lt;40</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11250</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357235</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357235</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Nicoletti</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Paul</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 32610, Gainesville, FL, USA</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Tropical Animal Health and Production</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">24/1(1992-03-01), 40-44</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0049-4747</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">24:1&lt;40</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1992</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">24</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11250</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
