caa a22 4500 475743539 CHVBK 20180406123506.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170329e20000901xx s 000 0 eng 10.1023/A:1004129514569 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1004129514569 Manesse Daniele INRP, Université de Paris-V, 12 rue de l'école de Médecine, 72570, Paris, France aut Remarques critques à propos de l'enquête internationale sur la litteratie [Elektronische Daten] [Daniele Manesse] There is no doubt of the necessity and importance of an international comparative inquiry concerning literacy. The difficulties involved in such an inquiry are also incontestable. In France the seemingly improbable results of the survey led to the French authorities - who had no doubt been insufficiently vigilant during the earlier stages of the survey - refusing to make the results public. These results highlight a number of methodological flaws that beset this vast undertaking, drawing attention to the need for better procedural precautions and a more adequate notion of literacy. This article presents a synthesis of the counter-investigations demanded by the French authorities, which justify their doubts on the IALS methods, and opens up a debate on the conception of literacy that was applied in the tests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000 International Review of Education Kluwer Academic Publishers 46/5(2000-09-01), 407-417 0020-8566 46:5<407 2000 46 11159 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004129514569 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004129514569 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Manesse Daniele INRP, Université de Paris-V, 12 rue de l'école de Médecine, 72570, Paris, France aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- International Review of Education Kluwer Academic Publishers 46/5(2000-09-01), 407-417 0020-8566 46:5<407 2000 46 11159 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer