<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475750594</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123522.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1008775015126</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1008775015126</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Achtziger</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Wolfgang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Applied Mathematics, LS II, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimization with Variable Sets of Constraints and an Application to Truss Design</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Wolfgang Achtziger]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">We discuss the minimization of a continuous function on a subset of Rn subject to a finite set of continuous constraints. At each point, a given set-valued map determines the subset of constraints considered at this point. Such problems arise e.g. in the design of engineering structures. After a brief discussion on the existence of solutions, the numerical treatment of the problem is considered. It is briefly motivated why standard approaches generally fail. A method is proposed approximating the original problem by a standard one depending on a parameter. It is proved that by choosing this parameter large enough, each solution to the approximating problem is a solution to the original one. In many applications, an upper bound for this parameter can be computed, thus yielding the equivalence of the original problem to a standard optimization problem. The proposed method is applied to the problem of optimally designing a loaded truss subject to local buckling conditions. To our knowledge this problem has not been solved before. A numerical example of reasonable size shows the proposed methodology to work well.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">continuous optimization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">numerical optimization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">constrained programming</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">successive approximation methods</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">structural optimization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">truss topology optimization</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Computational Optimization and Applications</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">15/1(2000-01-01), 69-96</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0926-6003</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">15:1&lt;69</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">15</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10589</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008775015126</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008775015126</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Achtziger</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Wolfgang</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Institute of Applied Mathematics, LS II, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Computational Optimization and Applications</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">15/1(2000-01-01), 69-96</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0926-6003</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">15:1&lt;69</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">15</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10589</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
