caa a22 4500 475763262 CHVBK 20180406123557.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170329e20000601xx s 000 0 eng 10.1023/A:1010115911720 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1010115911720 Ball Michael Faculty of the Built Environment, South Bank University, Wandworth Rd., SW8 2JZ, London, U.K. aut Driving in neutral: Is it the way forward for housing policy? [Elektronische Daten] [Michael Ball] The 'slibertarian' argument of PeterKing aims to put tenure neutrality and a negativeincome tax in place of current government supportfor housing. However, formulating rules for tenureneutrality is hard and the negative income tax mayrequire unacceptably high taxes. Real worldcomplexity makes such simple rules with regard tohousing difficult to achieve. Such complexity alsohelps to make a case for social housing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000 housing and social theory nationallicence housing policy nationallicence social housing nationallicence tax neutrality nationallicence Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Kluwer Academic Publishers 15/2(2000-06-01), 131-137 1566-4910 15:2<131 2000 15 10901 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010115911720 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010115911720 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Ball Michael Faculty of the Built Environment, South Bank University, Wandworth Rd., SW8 2JZ, London, U.K aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Kluwer Academic Publishers 15/2(2000-06-01), 131-137 1566-4910 15:2<131 2000 15 10901 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer