<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475773799</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123625.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1007122322571</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1007122322571</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cameron</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, King's College, London, United Kingdom</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Renal transplantation in the elderly</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[J. Cameron]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Recent data show that, despite a long period during which fewelderly patients in end-stage renal failure received grafts, thereare neither medical nor ethical grounds for avoiding kidneytransplantation, at least in those aged under 70 or even 75 years ofage. Units in which transplantation in older recipients is routine showa good survival of recipients, and comparable survival of grafts tothose placed in younger recipients. This equality of graft survival withage arises because, although death with a functioning graft is morecommon in the elderly (principally from cardiovascular disease andinfections, with malignant diseases becoming more important with time),graft losses from rejection are lower, and so overall outcomes aresimilar. Long-term patient survival is better, quality of life isimproved and treatment is cheaper than in comparable elderly patientsmaintained on hemodialysis or chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Interms of allocation to older recipients, this success presents majorpractical and ethical difficulties given the shortage of cadaver organs.Data do not support the idea of 'sage-matching' older or marginalkidneys to older recipients: like their younger counterparts, olderrecipients do better with organs from younger donors. Living donors canbe used successfully even in those over 70, and elderly living donorshave a place in the treatment of the elderly. The optimumimmunosuppressive regimes for elderly recipients have not beendetermined, given their poorer immune responsiveness and lower rejectionrates compared with younger individuals.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">'sAge matching' kidney and recipient</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Elderly recipients</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Graft loss</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Immunosuppression</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Kidney transplantation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Urology and Nephrology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">32/2(2000-06-01), 193-201</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0301-1623</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">32:2&lt;193</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">32</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11255</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007122322571</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007122322571</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Cameron</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, King's College, London, United Kingdom</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Urology and Nephrology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">32/2(2000-06-01), 193-201</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0301-1623</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">32:2&lt;193</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">32</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11255</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
