<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475790936</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123710.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000701xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s004239900055</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s004239900055</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Lymph-node dissection in breast cancer</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[A. Bembenek, P. M. Schlag]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background: Along with the ongoing modifications in treatment of primary breast cancer, the purpose and extent of lymph-node dissection has changed. The following is an overview of the current knowledge and practice of lymph-node dissection in breast cancer, with special regard to expected developments in the near future. Axillary dissection is described as a ten-step procedure, including dissection of level-I and -II and Rotter's nodes, without level-III nodes, providing at least ten lymph nodes for accurate staging information. Discussion: Axillary dissection still offers the most efficient local control in node-positive patients, whereas, in primarily node-negative patients, irradiation seems to be equally effective. In general, lymph-node dissection does not alter overall survival but there is no doubt that surgical therapy still contributes to cure in early-breast-cancer patients and seems to be curative for certain patients with stage-I carcinoma. The lymph node status of the axilla is crucial for the indication of adjuvant therapy in early invasive breast cancer, but an increasing number of clinical node-negative patients could be managed with information based on features of the primary tumor, regardless of the nodal status. The most promising new concept for the selection of node-positive patients, while avoiding unnecessary morbidity of axillary dissection in early-breast-cancer patients, is the sentinel-node concept. The principle is based on the identification of the first ”sentinel” lymph node reached by lymphatic flow. Thus, only proven node-positive patients undergo axillary dissection. Local failure of internal mammary lymph nodes is rarely recognized; however, internal mammary lymph nodes seem to have an underestimated prognostic significance in about 10-20% of axillary node-negative patients. This may lead to the withholding of systemic therapy for patients with early breast cancer. Nevertheless, there is no indication for a routine parasternal dissection today. The sentinel-node concept may also support the selection of diagnostic internal lymph-node biopsy and subsequent adjuvant therapy in cases with no axillary lymph-node metastases but with internal lymph-node metastases.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Key words Breast cancer</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lymph-node dissection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lymph-node status</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Lymphonodectomy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Sentinel-node biopsy</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Bembenek</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Charité Humboldt-University, Lindenberger Weg 80, D-13122 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49-30-94171400 Fax: +49-30-94171404, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Schlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P. M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Charité Humboldt-University, Lindenberger Weg 80, D-13122 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49-30-94171400 Fax: +49-30-94171404, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">385/4(2000-07-01), 236-245</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1435-2443</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">385:4&lt;236</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">385</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">423</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004239900055</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s004239900055</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Bembenek</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Charité Humboldt-University, Lindenberger Weg 80, D-13122 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49-30-94171400 Fax: +49-30-94171404, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Schlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">P. M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Charité Humboldt-University, Lindenberger Weg 80, D-13122 Berlin, Germany Tel.: +49-30-94171400 Fax: +49-30-94171404, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">385/4(2000-07-01), 236-245</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1435-2443</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">385:4&lt;236</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">385</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">423</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
