<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475798163</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123730.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000501xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s001700050173</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s001700050173</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A Study on an Evaluation Method for Form Deviations of 2D Contours from Coordinate Measurement</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[H. Qiu, Y.-B. Li, K. Cheng, Y. Li, J. Wang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A practical approach towards evaluating form deviations of 2D complex contour profiles from the coordinate measurement data of discrete points is proposed. In this approach, a 2D complex contour is represented approximately by the combination of straight line and circular arc segments under the condition of satisfying the prespecified interpolation accuracy. The form deviation of a measured point is calculated relative to the approximate contour and the form deviation of the whole contour is evaluated using either the minimum zone criterion (MZC) or the least squares criterion (LSC). It has been demonstrated that the difference between the deviation definitions, one relative to the original contour and the other to the approximate contour, is not larger than the prespecified accuracy value, i.e. the evaluation precision of the form deviation can be sufficiently guaranteed. The effectiveness and the efficiency of the approach are verified with a practical example of a planar cam contour. Moreover, a weighted LSC technique is proposed in order to obtain a rational evaluation result for the measured points with non-uniform length interval.:</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Keywords:Computer-aided inspection</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Coordinate measurement</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Form deviation evaluation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Qiu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan, JP</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.-B</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of Wales Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cheng</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Engineering, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of Wales Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700050173</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700050173</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Qiu</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">H.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan, JP</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.-B</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of Wales Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Cheng</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Engineering, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Li</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Y.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of Wales Cardiff, Cardiff, UK, GB</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
