<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475811283</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123759.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20001101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s001920070005</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s001920070005</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Benson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J. T.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Indiana University/Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Sacral Nerve Stimulation Results may be Improved by Electrodiagnostic Techniques</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[J. T. Benson]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sacral nerve electrical stimulation (sacral neuromodulation) therapy for patients with refractory urge incontinence, frequency and urgency, and non-obstructive retention yields an effective 75%-80% success rate. Electrodes are surgically implanted if initial percutaneous stimulation testing has a successful clinical response. Unfortunately, up to 50% of patients are denied surgical implantation because of an unsuccessful response to the test stimulation. In this descriptive study, adding electrodiagnostic monitoring to the currently used biological monitoring techniques was associated with a reduction in the number of tested patients denied implantation to 20%. These findings suggest that the incorporation of electrodiagnostic techniques may improve the clinical efficacy of sacral stimulation therapy. Randomized prospective testing of this hypothesis is suggested.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Key words:Electrodiagnosis - Implantable pulse generator - Nerve conduction study - Sacral neuromodulation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">International Urogynecology Journal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">11/6(2000-11-01), 352-357</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0937-3462</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">11:6&lt;352</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">11</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">192</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920070005</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920070005</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Benson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J. T.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Indiana University/Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">International Urogynecology Journal</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">11/6(2000-11-01), 352-357</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0937-3462</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">11:6&lt;352</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">11</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">192</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
