<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">47581293X</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123801.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1006390802191</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1006390802191</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Godt</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik an der Universität Bremen, Universitätsallee, GW1, D-28359, Bremen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Enforcement of Environmental Law by Individuals and Interest Groups: Reconceptualizing Standing</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Christine Godt]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The paper argues that environmental law can learn from consumer law as far as standing is concerned. Valuable guidance can be given to both individual and collective action. Consumer law rests on a well-founded concept of a double-track procedural system of complementary individual and collective enforcement that has undergone a considerable development over the years. With special reference to the European Court of Justice decision C-321/95 P (Greenpeace International and 18 Others v. Commission) of 2 April 1998, three arguments are put forward. Firstly, environmental law may learn from consumer law by adopting the EC approach to confer direct effect to secondary law. This empowers the individual with respect to environmental as well as participatory ends. Secondly, environmental law may espouse modern approaches with respect to the standing of associations. Thirdly, theories of judicial review need to be rethought, taking into account the new conflicts that emerge from EC integration.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Consumer Policy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/1(2000-03-01), 79-105</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0168-7034</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:1&lt;79</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10603</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006390802191</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006390802191</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Godt</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Christine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik an der Universität Bremen, Universitätsallee, GW1, D-28359, Bremen, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Consumer Policy</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">23/1(2000-03-01), 79-105</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0168-7034</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">23:1&lt;79</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10603</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
