<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475826604</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123830.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1004137906908</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1004137906908</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
   <subfield code="a">A Unified Approach to Second Order Optimality Criteria in Nonlinear Design of Experiments</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Holger Dette, Yuri Grigoriev]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In the nonlinear regression model we consider the optimal design problem with a second order design D-criterion. Our purpose is to present a general approach to this problem, which includes the asymptotic second order bias and variance criterion of the least squares estimator and criteria using the volume of confidence regions based on different statistics. Under assumptions of regularity for these statistics a second order approximation of the volume of these regions is derived which is proposed as a quadratic optimality criterion. These criteria include volumes of confidence regions based on the u n - representable statistics. An important difference between the criteria presented in this paper and the second order criteria commonly employed in the recent literature is that the former criteria are independent of the vector of residuals. Moreover, a refined version of the commonly applied criteria is obtained, which also includes effects of nonlinearity caused by third derivatives of the response function.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">D -optimal design</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">nonlinear regression model</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">second order approximation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">asymptotic expansion</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Dette</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Holger</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780, Bochum, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Grigoriev</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yuri</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fakultät für Angewandte Mathematik, Technische Universität, 630092, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">52/3(2000-09-01), 574-597</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0020-3157</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">52:3&lt;574</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">52</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10463</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004137906908</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004137906908</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Dette</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Holger</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fakultät für Mathematik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780, Bochum, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Grigoriev</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Yuri</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Fakultät für Angewandte Mathematik, Technische Universität, 630092, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">52/3(2000-09-01), 574-597</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0020-3157</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">52:3&lt;574</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2000</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">52</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10463</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
