caa a22 4500 475840232 CHVBK 20180406123859.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170329e20001201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1023/A:1005203611524 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1005203611524 Milyo Jeffrey Department of Economics, Tufts University, 02155, Medford, MA, U.S.A. aut Logical Deficiencies in Spatial Models: A Constructive Critique [Elektronische Daten] [Jeffrey Milyo] A fundamental property of any good theoryis logical consistency. However, two commonassumptions in the rational choice approach topolitical analysis (that induced preferences overpolicy are separable and that such preferences areindependent of changes in exogenous factors) are notconsistent with the archetypal assumptions ofindividual utility maximization. These particularpathologies of spatial models of politics have notbeen well recognized in the political scienceliterature. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000 Public Choice Kluwer Academic Publishers 105/3-4(2000-12-01), 273-289 0048-5829 105:3-4<273 2000 105 11127 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005203611524 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005203611524 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Milyo Jeffrey Department of Economics, Tufts University, 02155, Medford, MA, U.S.A aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Public Choice Kluwer Academic Publishers 105/3-4(2000-12-01), 273-289 0048-5829 105:3-4<273 2000 105 11127 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer