caa a22 4500 475841808 CHVBK 20180406123903.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170329e20000301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1023/A:1009477906883 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1009477906883 Anderson Elizabeth Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA aut Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales [Elektronische Daten] [Elizabeth Anderson] McLachlan and Swales dispute my arguments against commercial surrogatemotherhood. In reply, I argue that commercial surrogate contractsobjectionably commodify children because they regardparental rights over children not as trusts, to be allocated in the bestinterests of the child, but as like property rights, to be allocatedat the will o the parents. They also express disrespect for mothers, bycompromising their inalienable right to act in the best interest of theirchildren, when this interest calls for mothers to assert a custody rightin their children. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000 commodification nationallicence Commercial Surrogate Motherhood nationallicence surrogacy nationallicence Brazier Report nationallicence medical ethics nationallicence Health Care Analysis Kluwer Academic Publishers 8/1(2000-03-01), 19-26 1065-3058 8:1<19 2000 8 10728 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477906883 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477906883 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Anderson Elizabeth Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Health Care Analysis Kluwer Academic Publishers 8/1(2000-03-01), 19-26 1065-3058 8:1<19 2000 8 10728 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer