<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">475842146</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180406123903.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170329e20000301xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s101400050006</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s101400050006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The role of spiral CT using the pulmonary embolus protocol: a comparison of emergency department and hospitalized populations</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[A. B. Montgomery, R. C. Gilkeson, J. Glauser, K. E. Applegate]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Purpose: To compare the incidence of CT scan-detected pulmonary embolism, the CT scan-detected alternative findings (ancillary findings and alternative radiologic diagnoses), and the patient characteristics in emergency department and in hospitalized patients. Materials and methods: 81 spiral CT scans in 79 consecutive adult emergency department patients were retrospectively identified by computer search. During the same 9-month interval, 131 consecutive adult in-patients were similarly identified. The in-house and emergency department populations were compared in respect of incidence of pulmonary embolism and alternative findings using χ 2 analysis. Results: 81 emergency department scans and 135 in-patient scans were evaluated. Of these, 22 emergency department scans (27.1 %) and 37 in-patient scans (27.4 %) were positive for pulmonary embolism. Of the scans that were negative for a pulmonary embolism, 45 emergency department scans (76.2 %) and 88 in-patient scans (89.8 %) were positive for alternative findings. These included atelectasis, adenopathy, metastatic disease, and pneumomediastinum. Alternative radiologic diagnoses on scans negative for pulmonary embolism occurred in 8/59 emergency department patients (13.5 %) and in 17/98 in-patients (17.3 %). These included pneumonia, tumor, mucus plugging, pericardial effusions, and thoracic aortic dissection. Conclusions: No significant difference exists between the emergency department and in-patient populations for the incidence of pulmonary embolism on spiral CT scans. Although a significant difference did exist between these populations in respect to alternative findings, the high percentage of alternative findings in both populations shows a possible advantage of CT over the traditional test, the ventilation-perfusion scan. Therefore, spiral CT should not be limited to the in-patient population as the first-line imaging modality for the diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary embolism.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">American Society of Emergency Radiology, 2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Key words Pulmonary embolism - Spiral CT - Ventilation-perfusion scan</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Montgomery</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A. B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA e-mail: Monty1989@hotmail.com Tel.: + 1-2 16-8 44 31 13 Fax: + 1-2 16-8 44 39 05, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gilkeson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R. C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA e-mail: Monty1989@hotmail.com Tel.: + 1-2 16-8 44 31 13 Fax: + 1-2 16-8 44 39 05, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Glauser</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Applegate</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K. E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA e-mail: Monty1989@hotmail.com Tel.: + 1-2 16-8 44 31 13 Fax: + 1-2 16-8 44 39 05, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s101400050006</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s101400050006</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Montgomery</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">A. B.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA e-mail: Monty1989@hotmail.com Tel.: + 1-2 16-8 44 31 13 Fax: + 1-2 16-8 44 39 05, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gilkeson</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R. C.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA e-mail: Monty1989@hotmail.com Tel.: + 1-2 16-8 44 31 13 Fax: + 1-2 16-8 44 39 05, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Glauser</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">J.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Applegate</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">K. E.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106, USA e-mail: Monty1989@hotmail.com Tel.: + 1-2 16-8 44 31 13 Fax: + 1-2 16-8 44 39 05, US</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
