<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">477073190</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405111432.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170330e19960901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02765804</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02765804</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Hattingh</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Outspan Citrus Centre, Nelspruit 1200, PO Box 28, South Africa</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The use of insect growth regulators - implications for ipm with citrus in southern africa as an example</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[V. Hattingh]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="246" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">L'utilisation de régulateurs de croissance d'insectes et ses conséquences en termes de protection intégrée sur cultures d'agrumes en Afrique du Sud</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">IGRs have been widely promoted as being ideal IPM compatible pesticides. A number of IGRs have been used extensively on citrus in southern Africa providing excellent control of some target pests. However, field experience has indicated that this has had considerable direct and indirect detrimental effects on IPM. Bioassays confirmed that some of the IGRs used are highly detrimental to certain coccinellid and hymenopteran biocontrol agents of economic importance. Field experience and bioassays have indicated extreme persistence and widespread contamination resulting from agricultural use of some of these products. This presents a serious obstacle to maximisation of biocontrol in IPM and the success of future biocontrol projects using IGR-sensitive species. It also gives rise to concern about potential environmental contamination. In conclusion the use of IGRs should not be considered advantageous to IPM without careful investigation of their potential non-target effects in the particular agro-ecosystem and appropriate consideration for non-target effects in the surrounding environment.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Lavoisier Abonnements, 1996</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">IPM</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">IGRs</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">non-target effects</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Entomophaga</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">41/3-4(1996-09-01), 513-518</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0013-8959</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">41:3-4&lt;513</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">41</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10526</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765804</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765804</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Hattingh</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">V.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Outspan Citrus Centre, Nelspruit 1200, PO Box 28, South Africa</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Entomophaga</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Netherlands</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">41/3-4(1996-09-01), 513-518</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0013-8959</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">41:3-4&lt;513</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1996</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">41</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10526</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
