caa a22 4500 477122477 CHVBK 20180405111640.0 cr unu---uuuuu 170330e19961201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/BF02196990 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/BF02196990 Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice [Elektronische Daten] [Carol Kulik, E. Lind, Maurice Ambrose, Robert MacCoun] Gender differences in treatment and in judgments of distributive and procedural justice were examined. Three hundred nine litigants who had been involved in arbitrated auto negligence lawsuits responded to exit surveys. Two mechanisms by which gender might influence justice perceptions were explored. First, we examined whether a "chivalry bias” might be operating, in which the procedures systematically favor women over men. If such biases occur, women might feel they had been treated more fairly because of egocentric biases. Results provided only modest support for the chivalry bias. While women received slightly better awards and perceived somewhat more control than men, these differences had no effect on perceptions of distributive or procedural justice. Second, we examined whether men and women differ systematically in the factors they use as indicators of distributive and procedural justice. On the basis of group-value theory we predicted that women might place more emphasis on standing or on outcome favorability. The study revealed that men and women did differ in how they defined distributive justice, with women placing more emphasis on their perceived standing and on their perceptions of the favorability of their outcomes. There were no substantial gender differences in how procedural justice was defined. Results are interpreted in terms of how women might be responding to insecurity about facing a justice system historically dominated by men. Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1996 justice nationallicence arbitration nationallicence gender nationallicence procedural justice nationallicence distributive justice nationallicence Kulik Carol University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois aut Lind E. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina aut Ambrose Maurice University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado aut MacCoun Robert Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkley, California aut Social Justice Research Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 9/4(1996-12-01), 351-369 0885-7466 9:4<351 1996 9 11211 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196990 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196990 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Kulik Carol University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Lind E. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Ambrose Maurice University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- MacCoun Robert Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkley, California aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Social Justice Research Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 9/4(1996-12-01), 351-369 0885-7466 9:4<351 1996 9 11211 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence SWISSBIB 477122477 BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer