<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     caa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">477140351</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180405111730.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170330e19970901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1023/A:1024739325390</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1023/A:1024739325390</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Client Assessment by Novice and Expert Psychologists: A Comparison of Strategies</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Kathy O'Byrne, Rodney Goodyear]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This study examined the amount and type of information expert and novice psychologists sought about a client to form their clinical impressions. Novices (N = 14) were graduate students in psychology who reported a mean of 1.8 years professional experience; experts (N = 14) were university counseling center psychologists with a mean of 13 years experience and who were peer-nominated as experts. All were presented with the same short description of a client and her presenting problem, then were to ask whatever questions they believed necessary to make an assessment and treatment plan. Experts and novices did not differ with respect to their confidence in their assessment. However, compared to novices, experts requested significantly more information (Ms of 23.1 vs. 14.9 questions) and focused less on crisis aspects of the client situation (56.5 vs. 64.4% of the questions).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1997</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">counseling and assessment</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">expertise</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">counseling psychology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">O'Byrne</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kathy</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Counseling Psychology, University of Southern California, Fullerton, California</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Goodyear</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Rodney</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Counseling Psychology, University of Southern California, Fullerton, California</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Educational Psychology Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/3(1997-09-01), 267-278</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1040-726X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:3&lt;267</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1997</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10648</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024739325390</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024739325390</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">O'Byrne</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Kathy</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Counseling Psychology, University of Southern California, Fullerton, California</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Goodyear</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Rodney</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Division of Counseling Psychology, University of Southern California, Fullerton, California</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Educational Psychology Review</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/3(1997-09-01), 267-278</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1040-726X</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:3&lt;267</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">1997</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">10648</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
