naa a22 4500 510723934 CHVBK 20180411082928.0 cr unu---uuuuu 180411e20131201xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s13347-013-0129-4 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s13347-013-0129-4 Biletzki Anat Quinnipiac University, Hamden, USA aut Online Security: What's in a Name? [Elektronische Daten] [Anat Biletzki] This article motions to a real contradiction between online security and civil rights. It traverses semantic and conceptual elaborations of both security and human rights, narrowing their range to national security and human rather than civil rights, and suggests that the concept of security itself, whether online or not, is a rhetorical instrument in the hands of interested parties, mostly states and militaries. This instrument is used to undermine human rights precisely by means of its association and even identification with military and national settings. Asking whether the same ethics applies in the case of online security (vs. human rights), our tentative conclusion is that a similar moral determination rules in the case of online security, which may be exponentially more complex, but no less ethically compelling. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2013 Human rights nationallicence Online security nationallicence Rhetoric nationallicence Meaning as use nationallicence Philosophy & Technology Springer Netherlands 26/4(2013-12-01), 397-410 2210-5433 26:4<397 2013 26 13347 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0129-4 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0129-4 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Biletzki Anat Quinnipiac University, Hamden, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Philosophy & Technology Springer Netherlands 26/4(2013-12-01), 397-410 2210-5433 26:4<397 2013 26 13347 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer