<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510724825</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411082931.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20130901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11947-012-0891-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11947-012-0891-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Optimization of Ultrahigh-Pressure Extraction of Polyphenolic Antioxidants from Green Tea by Response Surface Methodology</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Jun Xi, Baishu Wang]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">A new extraction technique, ultrahigh-pressure extraction, was used to obtain antioxidants from green tea. The response surface methodology was employed to optimize the extraction process. The effects of ethanol concentration (x 1, 33.2-66.8%), pressure (x 2, 281.8-618.2MPa), and liquid/solid ratio (x 3, 11.6-28.4ml/g) on the total phenolic content (y 1) and α,α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl free radical scavenging activity (y 2) were investigated. Analysis of variance showed that second-order polynomial models produced a satisfactory fitting of the experimental data with regard to total phenolic content (R 2 = 0.9996, P &lt; 0.0001) and antioxidant capacity (R 2 = 0.9986, P &lt; 0.0001). The optimal condition determined was as follows: ethanol concentration, 50%; pressure, 490MPa; and liquid/solid ratio, 20ml/g. Under this condition, the maximum total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of 583.8 ± 0.9mg/g dry weight and 85.6 ± 0.7% could be achieved, respectively, which were well matched with the predicted value.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ultrahigh-pressure extraction</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Response surface methodology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Total phenolic content</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Antioxidant activity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Green tea</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Xi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jun</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Baishu</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Food and Bioprocess Technology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">6/9(2013-09-01), 2538-2546</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1935-5130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">6:9&lt;2538</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">6</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11947</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0891-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0891-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Xi</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jun</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wang</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Baishu</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, 610065, Chengdu, China</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Food and Bioprocess Technology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">6/9(2013-09-01), 2538-2546</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1935-5130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">6:9&lt;2538</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">6</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11947</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
