<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510727042</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411082939.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20130201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11947-011-0660-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11947-011-0660-1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Physicochemical Properties of Dietary Fibres Prepared from Ambarella ( Spondias cytherea ) and Mango ( Mangifera indica ) Peels</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Benoît Koubala, Germain Kansci, Catherine Garnier, Jean-François Thibault, Marie-Christine Ralet]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The preparation of fibres from mango and ambarella peels can offer a way to upgrade by-products. Comparatively to lime, ambarella and mango fibres were prepared from their corresponding peels using ethanolic treatment (85% at 70°C/5min). The peels were characterised for their dry matter content, pH and apparent viscosity. The soluble dietary fibre (SDF) and insoluble dietary fibre (IDF) contents of the samples were determined. Hydration capacity of these fibres was evaluated. Results showed that the ethanolic treatment of the peels (85% at 70°C/5min) had significant (p &lt; 0.05) effects on the contents of neutral sugars and uronic acid (from 105 to even 203mg/g in case of mango fibre). For ambarella fibres, the proportion of IDF (51%) was highest and that of SDF (34%) was lowest. Mango and lime fibres exhibited similar values of IDF (40-43%) and SDF (50-57%). Mango peel fibres had higher hydration capacities than ambarella and lime fibres. The best dietary fibres content and the high hydration capacities of mango peel fibres favour their exploitation in dietary fibre-rich foods preparation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ambarella</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mango</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Peels</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Fibres</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Physicochemical properties</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Hydration</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Koubala</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Benoît</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Life and Earth Sciences, University of Maroua, PO Box 55, Maroua, Cameroon</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Kansci</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Germain</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biochemistry, University of Yaounde, PO Box 812, Yaounde, Cameroon</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Garnier</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Catherine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, National Institute of Agronomic Research, F-44300, Cedex 03, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Thibault</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jean-François</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, National Institute of Agronomic Research, F-44300, Cedex 03, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ralet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marie-Christine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, National Institute of Agronomic Research, F-44300, Cedex 03, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Food and Bioprocess Technology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">6/2(2013-02-01), 591-597</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1935-5130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">6:2&lt;591</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">6</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11947</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0660-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">brief-communication</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0660-1</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Koubala</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Benoît</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Life and Earth Sciences, University of Maroua, PO Box 55, Maroua, Cameroon</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Kansci</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Germain</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Biochemistry, University of Yaounde, PO Box 812, Yaounde, Cameroon</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Garnier</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Catherine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, National Institute of Agronomic Research, F-44300, Cedex 03, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Thibault</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Jean-François</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, National Institute of Agronomic Research, F-44300, Cedex 03, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ralet</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Marie-Christine</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, National Institute of Agronomic Research, F-44300, Cedex 03, France</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Food and Bioprocess Technology</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">6/2(2013-02-01), 591-597</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1935-5130</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">6:2&lt;591</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">6</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11947</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
