<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510730892</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411082952.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20131001xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11295-013-0614-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11295-013-0614-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Genetic resilience in a historically profited root sprouting oak ( Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) at its southern boundary</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[María Valbuena-Carabaña, Luis Gil]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Recent land use changes entailed the abandonment of traditional forest practices, which genetic and ecological sustainability should be evaluated in the frame of current socioeconomic and ecological changes. The present study aimed to assess the conservation value of Quercus pyrenaica Willd. in stands subjected to two traditional rural practices, one specific (coppicing) and the other generic (maintenance of open parklands), and their effects on genetic diversity and clonal structure in this singular root sprouting oak at the southern limit of its distribution. Genetic diversity measures of seven nuclear simple sequence repeat markers were compared, and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibria were tested to be originated from recent population demography. Results showed that, regardless of forest structure, the degree of clonality was very similar (∼60%), being allele and lineage density proportional to stem density. Nevertheless, evenness of clonal distribution was higher in coppice, suggesting more homogeneous management than in open woodland. Contrary to previous beliefs, coppice stands do not involve genetic diversity losses; rather, the process of forest conversion into open woodland leads to the removal of numerous genetic lineages and low frequency alleles. The ancient presence of Q. pyrenaica in the region, which constituted quaternary glacial refuge, may contribute to its high genetic diversity. Historical vicissitudes in this anthropogenic deforested territory remark its resilient character; based on a specific fire pre-adaptive trait, continued coppicing fostered the preservation of its natural genetic diversity. This study evidences the importance of the integration of molecular and historical approximations to assess the genetic and conservation status of a secularly profited woody species.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Clonality</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Coppice forest</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Dehesa</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Forest management</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Genet</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Genetic diversity</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Multilocus lineage</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Multistem stool</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ramet</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Valbuena-Carabaña</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">María</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research Group, E.T.S. Forestry Engineering, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Ciudad Universitaria s/n 28040, Madrid, Spain</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Gil</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Luis</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research Group, E.T.S. Forestry Engineering, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Ciudad Universitaria s/n 28040, Madrid, Spain</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Tree Genetics &amp; Genomes</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/5(2013-10-01), 1129-1142</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1614-2942</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:5&lt;1129</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11295</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0614-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-013-0614-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Valbuena-Carabaña</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">María</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research Group, E.T.S. Forestry Engineering, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Ciudad Universitaria s/n 28040, Madrid, Spain</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Gil</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Luis</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research Group, E.T.S. Forestry Engineering, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Ciudad Universitaria s/n 28040, Madrid, Spain</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Tree Genetics &amp; Genomes</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">9/5(2013-10-01), 1129-1142</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1614-2942</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">9:5&lt;1129</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">9</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11295</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
