<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510735770</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411083009.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20131201xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11573-013-0687-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11573-013-0687-z</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Corporate valuation using imprecise cost of capital</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Simon Elsner, Hans-Christian Krumholz]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">If the estimated cost of capital bears a standard error, the estimation remains imprecise and firm values are biased on average, even though the estimator of the cost of capital is unbiased. Literature contributes approaches using adjusted discount factors to correct for such biases. This paper examines the theoretical and practical problems arising from the use of these approaches which are most likely to occur in the context of terminal value estimation. The adjusted discount factors imply time-dependent discount rates. Therefore, the commonly used valuation formula for perpetuities (Gordon formula) is no longer suitable to estimate unbiased terminal values. To continue application of this formula, this paper derives a new formula to directly adjust the cost of capital for estimation errors which yields unbiased terminal values.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Corporate valuation</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Cost of capital</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Discount factors</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Estimation bias</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Parameter uncertainty</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Elsner</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Simon</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ulm University, Ulm, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Krumholz</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hans-Christian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ulm University, Ulm, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Business Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">83/9(2013-12-01), 985-1014</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0044-2372</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">83:9&lt;985</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">83</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11573</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0687-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0687-z</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Elsner</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Simon</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ulm University, Ulm, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Krumholz</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Hans-Christian</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Ulm University, Ulm, Germany</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Business Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">83/9(2013-12-01), 985-1014</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0044-2372</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">83:9&lt;985</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">83</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11573</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
