<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510741622</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411083030.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20130601xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11845-012-0867-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11845-012-0867-9</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Pre-operative testing for pregnancy in Dublin Day Surgery Units</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[L. Wong, M. Wingfield]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Background: The safety of anaesthetic agents in early pregnancy cannot be guaranteed. Certain types of surgery, particularly gynaecological, may also be dangerous. It is therefore important to ensure that, female patients are not inadvertently pregnant when undergoing elective surgery. Different hospitals have different policies and guidelines in place to determine female patients' pregnancy status prior to elective surgery. Aims: This study aims to evaluate practices in Ireland with regard to methods used to exclude pregnancy in premenopausal women attending for day surgery. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to all consultants in Gynaecology and General Surgery. E-mail questionnaires were sent to all registrar trainees in both specialties. Letters were sent to nine Dublin teaching hospital day surgery units and followed up by telephone consultations. Results: The overall response rate was poor at 34.3%. Eighty per cent of respondents in the gynaecology specialty have encountered a preoperative patient with a positive pregnancy test at least once during their career versus 28.6% in the surgical specialty. Only 35% of gynaecology respondents would routinely inform female reproductive age patients of the need to avoid pregnancy prior to surgery versus 14.3% in the surgical specialty. On the day of elective surgery, 90% of gynaecologists would determine the LMP (last menstrual period) versus 35.7% of surgeons. The policy at all nine Dublin teaching hospitals is to perform a urinary HCG preoperatively but, their policies vary as to whether the patient's LMP, age and medical history are considered when performing a urinary HCG test. Conclusion: It is important that, female patients are counselled appropriately regarding the importance of using adequate contraception or, abstinence in order to avoid pregnancy prior to elective surgical procedures. Our survey shows that, gynaecologists are more likely to give this advice compared to our surgical colleagues. Nevertheless, the number of gynaecologists who do this is surprisingly low (35%). Urinary HCG is still the standard test used in most units to exclude pregnancy.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland, 2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Human chorionic gonadotrophin</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Day surgery units</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pregnancy testing</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wong</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Wingfield</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Irish Journal of Medical Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">182/2(2013-06-01), 231-235</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0021-1265</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">182:2&lt;231</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">182</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11845</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-012-0867-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-012-0867-9</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wong</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">L.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Wingfield</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Irish Journal of Medical Science</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">182/2(2013-06-01), 231-235</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0021-1265</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">182:2&lt;231</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">182</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11845</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
