naa a22 4500 510752934 CHVBK 20180411083111.0 cr unu---uuuuu 180411e20130401xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11841-011-0292-y doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11841-011-0292-y Göcke Benedikt Blackfriars Hall, Oxford University, 64 St. Giles, Oxford, England aut Panentheism and Classical Theism [Elektronische Daten] [Benedikt Göcke] Panentheism seems to be an attractive alternative to classical theism. It is not clear, though, what exactly panentheism asserts and how it relates to classical theism. By way of clarifying the thesis of panentheism, I argue that panentheism and classical theism differ only as regards the modal status of the world. According to panentheism, the world is an intrinsic property of God - necessarily there is a world - and according to classical theism the world is an extrinsic property of God - it is only contingently true that there is a world. Therefore, as long as we do not have an argument showing that necessarily there is a world, panentheism is not an attractive alternative to classical theism. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2012 God nationallicence World nationallicence Panentheism nationallicence Classical Theism nationallicence Omniscience nationallicence Sophia Springer Netherlands 52/1(2013-04-01), 61-75 0038-1527 52:1<61 2013 52 11841 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-011-0292-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-011-0292-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Göcke Benedikt Blackfriars Hall, Oxford University, 64 St. Giles, Oxford, England aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Sophia Springer Netherlands 52/1(2013-04-01), 61-75 0038-1527 52:1<61 2013 52 11841 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer