naa a22 4500 510778038 CHVBK 20180411083237.0 cr unu---uuuuu 180411e20130301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0 Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study [Elektronische Daten] [Peter Williams, Elizabeth Wager] Editors have a responsibility to retract seriously flawed articles from their journals. However, there appears to be little consistency in journals' policies or procedures for this. In a qualitative study, we therefore interviewed editors of science journals using semi-structured interviews to investigate their experience of retracting articles. We identified potential barriers to retraction, difficulties in the process and also sources of support and encouragement. Our findings have been used as the basis for guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011 Retractions nationallicence Reasons nationallicence Medical research nationallicence Williams Peter University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK aut Wager Elizabeth Sideview, 19 Station Road, HP27 9DE, Princes Risborough, UK aut Science and Engineering Ethics Springer Netherlands 19/1(2013-03-01), 1-11 1353-3452 19:1<1 2013 19 11948 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Williams Peter University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Wager Elizabeth Sideview, 19 Station Road, HP27 9DE, Princes Risborough, UK aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Science and Engineering Ethics Springer Netherlands 19/1(2013-03-01), 1-11 1353-3452 19:1<1 2013 19 11948 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer