naa a22 4500 510778666 CHVBK 20180411083239.0 cr unu---uuuuu 180411e20130901xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11948-012-9419-y doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11948-012-9419-y Towards a Richer Debate on Tissue Engineering: A Consideration on the Basis of NEST-Ethics [Elektronische Daten] [A. Oerlemans, M. van Hoek, E. van Leeuwen, S. van der Burg, W. Dekkers] In their 2007 paper, Swierstra and Rip identify characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation in the debate about the ethics of new and emerging science and technologies (or "NEST-ethics”). Taking their NEST-ethics structure as a starting point, we considered the debate about tissue engineering (TE), and argue what aspects we think ought to be a part of a rich and high-quality debate of TE. The debate surrounding TE seems to be predominantly a debate among experts. When considering the NEST-ethics arguments that deal directly with technology, we can generally conclude that consequentialist arguments are by far the most prominently featured in discussions of TE. In addition, many papers discuss principles, rights and duties relevant to aspects of TE, both in a positive and in a critical sense. Justice arguments are only sporadically made, some "good life” arguments are used, others less so (such as the explicit articulation of perceived limits, or the technology as a technological fix for a social problem). Missing topics in the discussion, at least from the perspective of NEST-ethics, are second "level” arguments—those referring to techno-moral change connected to tissue engineering. Currently, the discussion about tissue engineering mostly focuses on its so-called "hard impacts”—quantifiable risks and benefits of the technology. Its "soft impacts”—effects that cannot easily be quantified, such as changes to experience, habits and perceptions, should receive more attention. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2012 Hard and soft impacts of technology nationallicence NEST-ethics nationallicence Tissue engineering nationallicence Oerlemans A. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut van Hoek M. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut van Leeuwen E. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut van der Burg S. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut Dekkers W. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut Science and Engineering Ethics Springer Netherlands 19/3(2013-09-01), 963-981 1353-3452 19:3<963 2013 19 11948 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9419-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9419-y text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Oerlemans A. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- van Hoek M. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- van Leeuwen E. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- van der Burg S. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 700 1- Dekkers W. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101 (IQ 114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Science and Engineering Ethics Springer Netherlands 19/3(2013-09-01), 963-981 1353-3452 19:3<963 2013 19 11948 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer