naa a22 4500 510788963 CHVBK 20180411083312.0 cr unu---uuuuu 180411e20130301xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11406-013-9417-6 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11406-013-9417-6 Le Morvan Pierre Department of Philosophy, Religion and Classical Studies, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA aut Why the Standard View of Ignorance Prevails [Elektronische Daten] [Pierre Le Morvan] Rik Peels has forcefully argued that, contrary to what is widely held, ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In doing so, he has argued against the Standard View of Ignorance according to which they are equivalent, and argued for what he calls "the New View” according to which ignorance is equivalent (merely) to the lack or absence of true belief. In this paper, I defend the Standard View against Peels's latest case for the New View. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2013 Ignorance nationallicence Belief nationallicence Knowledge nationallicence Propositions nationallicence Facts nationallicence Truth nationallicence Falsehood nationallicence Philosophia Springer Netherlands 41/1(2013-03-01), 239-256 0048-3893 41:1<239 2013 41 11406 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9417-6 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9417-6 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Le Morvan Pierre Department of Philosophy, Religion and Classical Studies, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Philosophia Springer Netherlands 41/1(2013-03-01), 239-256 0048-3893 41:1<239 2013 41 11406 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer