naa a22 4500 510789587 CHVBK 20180411083315.0 cr unu---uuuuu 180411e20130601xx s 000 0 eng 10.1007/s11406-013-9440-7 doi (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11406-013-9440-7 Wolterstorff Nicholas Philosophical Theology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA aut Reply to Kevin Carnahan and Erik A. Anderson [Elektronische Daten] [Nicholas Wolterstorff] In my response to Kevin Carnahan, I explain the concept of religion that I have been working with in my writings on the place of religious reasons in public political discourse. While acknowledging that religion is often privatized, my concern has been with religion as a way of life. It is religion so understood that raises the most serious issues concerning the role of religion in public discourse. In my response to Erik A. Anderson, I go beyond what I have previously said about the role of religious reasons in public discourse. As an alternative to Rawlsian public reason, I argue that the essence of liberal democracy is that every citizen is to have equal political voice. I go on to consider what it is to exercise one's equal political voice as a moral engagement. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2013 Religion nationallicence Liberal democracy nationallicence Public reason nationallicence Equal political voice nationallicence Philosophia Springer Netherlands 41/2(2013-06-01), 429-435 0048-3893 41:2<429 2013 41 11406 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9440-7 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI 1 research-article jats NATIONALLICENCE 856 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9440-7 text/html Onlinezugriff via DOI NATIONALLICENCE 100 1- Wolterstorff Nicholas Philosophical Theology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA aut NATIONALLICENCE 773 0- Philosophia Springer Netherlands 41/2(2013-06-01), 429-435 0048-3893 41:2<429 2013 41 11406 Metadata rights reserved Springer special CC-BY-NC licence nationallicence BK010053 XK010053 XK010000 NATIONALLICENCE NATIONALLICENCE NL-springer