<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510806686</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411083421.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20131101xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11614-013-0099-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11614-013-0099-x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Ogien</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Albert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">CEMS-IMM/ EHESS Paris, 190 avenue de France, 75013, Paris, Frankreich</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Garfinkel reading Mead. What should sociology do with social naturalism?</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Albert Ogien]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This article presents a reconstruction of Mead's naturalistic argument in order to assess its significance for today's sociological analysis. To do so, it goes back to the early criticisms Garfinkel has addressed to Mead in a manuscript written in 1948. It considers the three points of contention that are discussed in this text (the Self versus action; the social act versus practical activity; role versus practice) and claims that Garfinkel's objections to Mead's work are similar to those that have been raised against Blumer's interpretation of Mead in the 1970s. The article then contends that this common misunderstanding of Mead's naturalistic stance stems from a misinterpretation of his conception of the &quot;significant symbol” which has often been mistaken for as a conception of meaning. This might shed light on the reasons why social naturalism has by and large been ignored by sociologists as well as outline the uses sociology should still make of Mead's proposals.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Pragmatism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Ethnomethodology</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Social naturalism</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Significant symbol</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Self</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Taking the role of the other</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Mead</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Garfinkel</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Durkheim</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">38(2013-11-01), 97-113</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1011-0070</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">38&lt;97</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">38</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11614</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-013-0099-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-013-0099-x</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Ogien</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Albert</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">CEMS-IMM/ EHESS Paris, 190 avenue de France, 75013, Paris, Frankreich</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">38(2013-11-01), 97-113</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1011-0070</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">38&lt;97</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">38</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11614</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
