<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">510808514</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CHVBK</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180411083430.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180411e20130901xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11579-013-0097-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11579-013-0097-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Acceptability indexes via $$g$$ -expectations: an application to liquidity risk</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[Emanuela Rosazza Gianin, Carlo Sgarra]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Recently, several authors focused their attention on acceptability indexes (AI) and their applications in Finance. The AI notion turns out to be quite flexible and several applications in different directions have been proposed. In particular, in Cherny and Madan (Int J Theor Appl Finance 13(8):1149-1177, 2010) illiquid markets are modeled via AI and bid and ask prices are described through a &quot;Conic Finance” approach. A different approach of dynamic type to bid and ask prices has been suggested by Bion-Nadal (J Math Econ 45(11):738-750, 2009), taking into account both transaction costs and liquidity risk, and based on time consistent pricing procedures. The purpose of the present paper is to suggest a further link between AI and risk measures based on the notion of $$g$$ -expectation, and by this powerful tool to fill the gap between the static description of liquidity introduced by Corcuera et al. (Int J Portfolio Anal Manag 1(1):80-91, 2012) and the dynamic description provided by Bion-Nadal (J Math Econ 45(11):738-750, 2009).</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Liquidity risk</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Acceptability indexes</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">$$g$$ -Expectations</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Convex risk measures</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Rosazza Gianin</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emanuela</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Dipartimento di Statistica e Metodi Quantitativi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Sgarra</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Carlo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Mathematics and Financial Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">7/4(2013-09-01), 457-475</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1862-9679</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">7:4&lt;457</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">7</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11579</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-013-0097-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">research-article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">jats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-013-0097-6</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">Onlinezugriff via DOI</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Rosazza Gianin</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Emanuela</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Dipartimento di Statistica e Metodi Quantitativi, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Sgarra</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">Carlo</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy</subfield>
   <subfield code="4">aut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Mathematics and Financial Economics</subfield>
   <subfield code="d">Springer Berlin Heidelberg</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">7/4(2013-09-01), 457-475</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">1862-9679</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">7:4&lt;457</subfield>
   <subfield code="1">2013</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">7</subfield>
   <subfield code="o">11579</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="900" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">Metadata rights reserved</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">Springer special CC-BY-NC licence</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">nationallicence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">NATIONALLICENCE</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">NL-springer</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
