<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>     naa a22        4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">528744607</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20180922060414.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr unu---uuuuu</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">180922s2013    xx      s     000 0 eng  </controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">0022-3514</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">10.1037/a0034352</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">(EDOC)oai:edoc.unibas.ch:30945</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Reinhard</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M. -A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Unconscious Processes Improve Lie Detection</subfield>
   <subfield code="h">[Elektronische Daten]</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">[M. -A. Reinhard, R. Greifeneder, M. Scharmach]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">openAccess</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">eu-repo</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">The capacity to identify cheaters is essential for maintaining balanced social relationships, yet humans have been shown to be generally poor deception detectors. In fact, a plethora of empirical findings holds that individuals are only slightly better than chance when discerning lies from truths. Here, we report 5 experiments showing that judges' ability to detect deception greatly increases after periods of unconscious processing. Specifically, judges who were kept from consciously deliberating outperformed judges who were encouraged to do so or who made a decision immediately; moreover, unconscious thinkers' detection accuracy was significantly above chance level. The reported experiments further show that this improvement comes about because unconscious thinking processes allow for integrating the particularly rich information basis necessary for accurate lie detection. These findings suggest that the human mind is not unfit to distinguish between truth and deception but that this ability resides in previously overlooked processes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Greifeneder</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Scharmach</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">105 (5), pp. 721-739</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-3514</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="u">https://edoc.unibas.ch/30945/3/Reinhard-Greifeneder-Scharmach_2013_Unconscious_processes_improve_lie_detection_manuscript.pdf</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">WWW-Backlink auf das Repository</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="908" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="D">1</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Article</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">edoc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2="7">
   <subfield code="a">PeerReviewed</subfield>
   <subfield code="2">edoc peerstatus</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">856</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">40</subfield>
   <subfield code="u">https://edoc.unibas.ch/30945/3/Reinhard-Greifeneder-Scharmach_2013_Unconscious_processes_improve_lie_detection_manuscript.pdf</subfield>
   <subfield code="q">text/html</subfield>
   <subfield code="z">WWW-Backlink auf das Repository</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">100</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Reinhard</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M. -A</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Greifeneder</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">R.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">700</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">1-</subfield>
   <subfield code="a">Scharmach</subfield>
   <subfield code="D">M.</subfield>
   <subfield code="e">joint author</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="950" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="P">773</subfield>
   <subfield code="E">0-</subfield>
   <subfield code="t">Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</subfield>
   <subfield code="g">105 (5), pp. 721-739</subfield>
   <subfield code="x">0022-3514</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="898" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">BK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">XK010053</subfield>
   <subfield code="c">XK010000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="949" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="B">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="F">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="b">EDOC</subfield>
   <subfield code="j">Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
