How Wealth Accumulation Can Promote Cooperation

Verfasser / Beitragende:
[Thomas Chadefaux, Dirk Helbing]
Ort, Verlag, Jahr:
2010
Enthalten in:
PLoS ONE, 5 (10), p. e13471
Format:
Artikel (online)
ID: 528787225
LEADER naa a22 4500
001 528787225
005 20180924065503.0
007 cr unu---uuuuu
008 180924e20101027xx s 000 0 eng
024 7 0 |a 10.3929/ethz-b-000024151  |2 doi 
024 7 0 |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0013471  |2 doi 
035 |a (ETHRESEARCH)oai:www.research-collecti.ethz.ch:20.500.11850/24151 
100 1 |a Chadefaux  |D Thomas 
245 1 0 |a How Wealth Accumulation Can Promote Cooperation  |h [Elektronische Daten]  |c [Thomas Chadefaux, Dirk Helbing] 
246 0 |a PLoS ONE 
506 |a Open access  |2 ethresearch 
520 3 |a Explaining the emergence and stability of cooperation has been a central challenge in biology, economics and sociology. Unfortunately, the mechanisms known to promote it either require elaborate strategies or hold only under restrictive conditions. Here, we report the emergence, survival, and frequent domination of cooperation in a world characterized by selfishness and a strong temptation to defect, when individuals can accumulate wealth. In particular, we study games with local adaptation such as the prisoner's dilemma, to which we add heterogeneity in payoffs. In our model, agents accumulate wealth and invest some of it in their interactions. The larger the investment, the more can potentially be gained or lost, so that present gains affect future payoffs. We find that cooperation survives for a far wider range of parameters than without wealth accumulation and, even more strikingly, that it often dominates defection. This is in stark contrast to the traditional evolutionary prisoner's dilemma in particular, in which cooperation rarely survives and almost never thrives. With the inequality we introduce, on the contrary, cooperators do better than defectors, even without any strategic behavior or exogenously imposed strategies. These results have important consequences for our understanding of the type of social and economic arrangements that are optimal and efficient. 
540 |a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported  |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0  |2 ethresearch 
700 1 |a Helbing  |D Dirk  |e joint author 
773 0 |t PLoS ONE  |d Lawrence, KS, USA : PLoS  |g 5 (10), p. e13471  |x 1932-6203 
856 4 0 |u http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/24151  |q text/html  |z WWW-Backlink auf das Repository (Open access) 
908 |D 1  |a Journal Article  |2 ethresearch 
950 |B ETHRESEARCH  |P 856  |E 40  |u http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/24151  |q text/html  |z WWW-Backlink auf das Repository (Open access) 
950 |B ETHRESEARCH  |P 100  |E 1-  |a Chadefaux  |D Thomas 
950 |B ETHRESEARCH  |P 700  |E 1-  |a Helbing  |D Dirk  |e joint author 
950 |B ETHRESEARCH  |P 773  |E 0-  |t PLoS ONE  |d Lawrence, KS, USA : PLoS  |g 5 (10), p. e13471  |x 1932-6203 
898 |a BK010053  |b XK010053  |c XK010000 
949 |B ETHRESEARCH  |F ETHRESEARCH  |b ETHRESEARCH  |j Journal Article  |c Open access